Legal scholar and professor Alan Dershowitz spoke with Sean Hannity Thursday after hours of impeachment hearings; directly responding to vicious comparisons between his Senate presentation and Adolf Hitler.
“They’re going to compare you to Hitler? They’re going to go that far because you have a different opinion?” asked Hannity.
“The reason they came after me is that they saw many Senators gather around me, including Democrats, and they all said how they were impressed by my Constitutional presentation… I never, ever, said or suggested a President can do anything he wants,” said Dershowitz.
“It was stated by Schiff, it was stated by Nadler, it was stated by Schumer, everybody on CNN and MSNBC, and it was categorically false,” he added.
Watch Dershowitz on ‘Hannity’ above. You can pick up a copy of Dershowitz’s new book, “Guilty by Association” here.
DERSHOWITZ ON HANNITY: Democrats Are Putting Themselves ‘ABOVE THE LAW’ on Impeachment Push
Attorney and legal analyst Alan Dershowitz spoke with Sean Hannity Wednesday night on the Democrats’ unconstitutional push to impeach President Trump; saying any move to remove him from office would be putting themselves “above the law.”
DERSHOWITZ SCHOOLS WARREN: ‘Presidential Candidates Should Have a Better Understanding of the Law’
Alan Dershowitz ripped Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s “mischaracterization” of his presentation before the US Senate this week; saying presidential candidates should “have a better understanding of the law.”
“Warren doesn’t understand the law. My former colleague, Senator Warren, claims she could not follow my carefully laid out presentation that everybody else seemed to understand. This says more about Warren than it does about me,” posted Dershowitz on social media.
“She also willfully mischaracterized what I said, claiming that I spoke about ‘intent.’ I challenge her to find that word anywhere in my presentation. I talked about the difficulty of discerning mixed motives,” he added.
She also willfully mischaracterized what I said, claiming that I spoke about “intent.” I challenge her to find that word anywhere in my presentation. I talked about the difficulty of discerning mixed motives. (2 of 3
— Alan Dershowitz (@AlanDersh) January 28, 2020
(3 OF 3)
If Warren knew anything about criminal law she would understand the distinction between motives – which are not elements of crime—and intent, which is. It’s the responsibility of presidential candidates to have a better understanding of the law.— Alan Dershowitz (@AlanDersh) January 28, 2020
“If Warren knew anything about criminal law she would understand the distinction between motives – which are not elements of crime—and intent, which is. It’s the responsibility of presidential candidates to have a better understanding of the law,” concluded Dershowitz.