36 DAYS UNTIL THE MIDTERM ELECTIONS 11/6/2018
**PRESIDENT TRUMP HOLDS A 90 MINUTES PRESS CONFERENCE AFTER TRADE DEAL
**QUESTIONS FROM THE PRESS QUICKLY TURNED FROM TRADE TO KAVANAUGH
**MORE DETAILS ARISE DISPROVING DR. FORD’S CLAIMS REGARDING JUDGE KAVANAUGH
**DEMOCRATS ARE SEARCHING FOR MORE WOMEN THAT MIGHT BE ABLE TO ACCUSE BRETT
**WOMEN SHOW UP TO DEFEND AND SUPPORT JUDGE KAVANAUGH
**PRESIDENT TRUMP’S NEW NAFTA TRADE DEAL – THEY SAID IT COULDN’T HAPPEN
4:05 PM ET – Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House, author of Trump’s America: The Truth about Our Nation’s Great Comeback, his latest NY Times bestseller, has been in politics for four decades. He has never seen the decay in our basic civility as he has seen with these proceedings:
The real question is: Are there any Democrats who are disgusted by this process of dishonest character assassination and manipulation? Are any upset that this is becoming their party’s operating pattern?
Are there any Democrats whose sense of decency forces them to vote “yes” for a decent man and brilliant jurist, whose entire public career has exemplified honesty, sincerity and patriotism?
Are there any Democrats who understand that a 36-year-old, unsupported allegation can’t possibly be the standard for blocking a U.S. Supreme Court nominee?
If no Democrat has the courage to vote for decency, honesty and a sense of fairness, then we are truly in deep trouble as a country.
The focus for the next few days ought to be on the Democrats.
Let us see what kind of a party they have become. (h/t FOX NEWS)
4:30 PM ET – Tucker Carlson, the host of Tucker Carlson Tonight on the Fox News Channel, offers his signature fearless and funny political commentary on how America’s ruling class has failed everyday Americans. His new book is out tomorrow, In Ship of Fools: How a Selfish Ruling Class is Bringing America to the Brink of Revolution.
In Ship of Fools: How a Selfish Ruling Class is Bringing America to the Brink of Revolution, Tucker Carlson tells the truth about the new American elites, a group whose power and wealth has grown beyond imagination even as the rest of the country has withered. The people who run America now barely interact with it. They fly on their own planes, ski on their own mountains, watch sporting events far from the stands in sky boxes. They have total contempt for you. “They view America the way a private equity firm sizes up an aging conglomerate,” Carlson writes, “as something outdated they can profit from. When it fails, they’re gone.” In Ship of Fools, Tucker Carlson offers a blistering critique of our new overlords. Traditional liberals are gone, he writes. The patchouli-scented hand-wringers who worried about whales and defended free speech have been replaced by globalists who hide their hard-edged economic agenda behind the smokescreen of identity politics. They’ll outsource your job while lecturing you about transgender bathrooms. Left and right, Carlson says, are no longer meaningful categories in America. “The rift is between those who benefit from the status quo, and those who don’t.” Our leaders are fools, Carlson concludes, “unaware that they are captains of a sinking ship.” But in the signature and witty style that viewers of Tucker Carlson Tonight have come to enjoy, his book answers the all-important question: How do we put the country back on course?
5:05 PM ET – Carrie Severino, Chief Counsel and Policy Director, Judicial Crisis Network, is here to discuss the upcoming FBI investigation, their scope and the questions at today’s trade presser on Kavanaugh and the statement by Rachel Mitchell following the hearing last week:
“In the legal context, here is my bottom line: A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”